🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of ballots that came in later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which election day went somewhat badly for him, where the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year backed Zohran now. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I thought it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to get over half. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. But overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.