🔗 Share this article Star Rejects Anti-Vax Position Following Voicing Disputed Covid Film The acclaimed actor has provided his voice to a feature-length documentary that questions the safety of vaccinations and commends ex- government figure Robert F Kennedy Jr. The Documentary's Provocative Origins Named "Plague of Corruption," the project is based on a popular book co-authored by Judy Mikovits, who gained notoriety during the pandemic for claims that the illness was a result of a faulty batch of the seasonal immunization. The book's collaborator, Kent Heckenlively, has also written books with conspiracy-prone radio host a known commentator. Heckenlively took to social media celebrating Neeson's participation in the project. A Strong Statement Representatives for the actor have issued a statement strongly denying suggestions that he holds anti-vax sentiments. "Many recognize that corruption might be present within the drug industry, but that should never be confused with opposition to vaccines," the statement explains. "Liam never has been, and remains not, against vaccines. His extensive work with the global charity underscores his consistent support for worldwide vaccination initiatives." The response continued that the actor was not involved in crafting the film's editorial content and that inquiries about its assertions are best addressed to the filmmakers. Central Claims Within the Feature According to the documentary, the narration read by Neeson makes several strong claims: It suggests that pro-immunization voices have insisted on "unconditional submission" to public institutions. It posits that "medical science has become deeply influenced by politics." Robert F Kennedy Jr is interviewed claiming, "The big problem with vaccines is that they simply are not properly vetted." The narration also criticizes pandemic restrictions, claiming they caused severe distress that resulted in thousands of lives. On the topic of Covid vaccines, it mentions a report that they were "hurriedly approved" and seen as "hazardous tests." Historical Context and Current Debates The film includes a 2004 BBC documentary about clinical trials on children, which was subsequently the subject of a correction by the corporation for unbalanced reporting. Last month, the political figure directed the Centers for Disease Control to change its longstanding position that there is no causal relationship between vaccines and autism. This claim is also referenced in the film, contrary to a fresh analysis from the WHO stating no such link has been found. An Earlier Statement of Endorsement Standing in contrast to the documentary's tone, Neeson has in the past shown firm endorsement for vaccines in his role as a charity ambassador. Two years ago, he referred to vaccines as "an incredible triumph," noting that "The debate about vaccines in the past few years has forgotten how much benefit they have done... It is perhaps one of the biggest human endeavors in human history." The documentary concludes with Neeson's narration proclaiming, "This isn't the finish of our story. Rather, it is the start of a different phase."
The acclaimed actor has provided his voice to a feature-length documentary that questions the safety of vaccinations and commends ex- government figure Robert F Kennedy Jr. The Documentary's Provocative Origins Named "Plague of Corruption," the project is based on a popular book co-authored by Judy Mikovits, who gained notoriety during the pandemic for claims that the illness was a result of a faulty batch of the seasonal immunization. The book's collaborator, Kent Heckenlively, has also written books with conspiracy-prone radio host a known commentator. Heckenlively took to social media celebrating Neeson's participation in the project. A Strong Statement Representatives for the actor have issued a statement strongly denying suggestions that he holds anti-vax sentiments. "Many recognize that corruption might be present within the drug industry, but that should never be confused with opposition to vaccines," the statement explains. "Liam never has been, and remains not, against vaccines. His extensive work with the global charity underscores his consistent support for worldwide vaccination initiatives." The response continued that the actor was not involved in crafting the film's editorial content and that inquiries about its assertions are best addressed to the filmmakers. Central Claims Within the Feature According to the documentary, the narration read by Neeson makes several strong claims: It suggests that pro-immunization voices have insisted on "unconditional submission" to public institutions. It posits that "medical science has become deeply influenced by politics." Robert F Kennedy Jr is interviewed claiming, "The big problem with vaccines is that they simply are not properly vetted." The narration also criticizes pandemic restrictions, claiming they caused severe distress that resulted in thousands of lives. On the topic of Covid vaccines, it mentions a report that they were "hurriedly approved" and seen as "hazardous tests." Historical Context and Current Debates The film includes a 2004 BBC documentary about clinical trials on children, which was subsequently the subject of a correction by the corporation for unbalanced reporting. Last month, the political figure directed the Centers for Disease Control to change its longstanding position that there is no causal relationship between vaccines and autism. This claim is also referenced in the film, contrary to a fresh analysis from the WHO stating no such link has been found. An Earlier Statement of Endorsement Standing in contrast to the documentary's tone, Neeson has in the past shown firm endorsement for vaccines in his role as a charity ambassador. Two years ago, he referred to vaccines as "an incredible triumph," noting that "The debate about vaccines in the past few years has forgotten how much benefit they have done... It is perhaps one of the biggest human endeavors in human history." The documentary concludes with Neeson's narration proclaiming, "This isn't the finish of our story. Rather, it is the start of a different phase."